Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Uruguay
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Sri Lanka rank
44th
Uruguay rank
44th
Open shrubland: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 44th and Uruguay ranks 44th of 149 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Sri Lanka, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay as of 2000.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 44th and Uruguay ranks 44th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.