Congo vs Ecuador: Open shrubland — Burning crop residues
Congo
0 t
in 2024
Ecuador
0 t
in 2024
Congo rank
44th
Ecuador rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Congo
- Ecuador
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Ecuador, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 44th and Ecuador ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92,576 t | 1,316 t | 91,261 t | Congo |
| 2000s | 7,677 t | 109.61 t | 7,567 t | Congo |
| 2010s | 61.12 t | 0 t | 61.12 t | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues, Congo or Ecuador?
- Congo, at 0 t against 0 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues between Congo and Ecuador?
- 0 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ecuador?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Ecuador rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Congo ranks 44th and Ecuador ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.