Latvia vs Libya: Open shrubland — Burning crop residues
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
Libya
0 t
in 2024
Latvia rank
44th
Libya rank
44th
Open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Latvia
- Libya
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Libya, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Libya ahead.
Latvia ranks 44th and Libya ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 219.68 t | 1,848 t | 1,629 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 t | 92.03 t | 92.03 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 t | 2,055 t | 2,055 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 t | 1,104 t | 1,104 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues, Latvia or Libya?
- Latvia, at 0 t against 0 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues between Latvia and Libya?
- 0 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Libya?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Libya rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Latvia ranks 44th and Libya ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.