Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Open shrubland — Burning crop residues

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1.95 million t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
160,955 t
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
14th
Zimbabwe rank
16th

Open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Zimbabwe
020.0M40.0M60.0M199020072024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 1.95 million t against 160,955 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.78 million t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 12.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 25.41 million t 467,792 t 24.94 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 8.68 million t 949,940 t 7.73 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 1.42 million t 497,511 t 919,096 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 1.09 million t 129,499 t 957,627 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Zimbabwe?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 1.95 million t against 160,955 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zimbabwe?
1.78 million t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Open shrubland — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/zimbabwe/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Open shrubland — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 9,224 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.