Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Open shrubland — Burning crop residues
Sudan
149,866 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
160,955 t
in 2024
Sudan rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
16th
Open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 160,955 t against 149,866 t in Sudan, a difference of 11,089 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 218 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26,264 t | 428,414 t | 402,149 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 63,007 t | 129,499 t | 66,491 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — burning crop residues, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 160,955 t against 149,866 t in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — burning crop residues between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 11,089 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for open shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Sudan ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.