China, Hong Kong SAR vs Uruguay: Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Uruguay
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
44th
Uruguay rank
44th
Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Uruguay
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 44th and Uruguay ranks 44th of 138 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Uruguay?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay as of 2000.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Uruguay?
- 0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Uruguay rank globally for open shrubland — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 44th and Uruguay ranks 44th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.