Congo vs Latvia: Open shrubland — Emissions
Congo
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Congo rank
44th
Latvia rank
44th
Open shrubland — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Latvia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2301 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.2296 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0177 kt | 0 kt | 0.0177 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions, Congo or Latvia?
- Congo, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions between Congo and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Latvia rank globally for open shrubland — emissions?
- Congo ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.