Ecuador vs Eritrea: Open shrubland — Emissions
Ecuador
0 kt
in 2024
Eritrea
0 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
44th
Eritrea rank
44th
Open shrubland — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Eritrea
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Eritrea, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 44th and Eritrea ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0039 kt | 0.5107 kt | 0.5068 kt | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0.2339 kt | 0.2337 kt | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0068 kt | 0.0068 kt | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0162 kt | 0.0162 kt | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions, Ecuador or Eritrea?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions between Ecuador and Eritrea?
- 0 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eritrea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Eritrea rank globally for open shrubland — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 44th and Eritrea ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.