Ecuador vs Malaysia: Open shrubland — Emissions
Ecuador
0 kt
in 2024
Malaysia
0 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
44th
Malaysia rank
44th
Open shrubland — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Malaysia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Malaysia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 44th and Malaysia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.003 kt | 0.0078 kt | 0.0048 kt | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0.001 kt | 0.0008 kt | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions, Ecuador or Malaysia?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions between Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 0 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for open shrubland — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 44th and Malaysia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.