Ecuador vs Serbia and Montenegro: Open shrubland — Emissions
Ecuador
0 kt
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 kt
in 2005
Ecuador rank
44th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
44th
Open shrubland — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 44th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0035 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.003 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.0004 kt | 0 kt | 0.0004 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions, Ecuador or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions between Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for open shrubland — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 44th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.