Costa Rica vs Fiji: Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Costa Rica
0 kt per person
in 2024
Fiji
0 kt per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
40th
Fiji rank
40th
Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Fiji
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Fiji, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 40th and Fiji ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Costa Rica or Fiji?
- Costa Rica, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Costa Rica and Fiji?
- 0 kt per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Fiji?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Fiji rank globally for open shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 40th and Fiji ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.