Costa Rica vs Guinea: Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Costa Rica
0 kt per person
in 2024
Guinea
0 kt per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
40th
Guinea rank
40th
Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Guinea
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Guinea, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 40th and Guinea ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Guinea |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, Costa Rica or Guinea?
- Costa Rica, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between Costa Rica and Guinea?
- 0 kt per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Guinea?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Guinea rank globally for open shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 40th and Guinea ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.