New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita
New Zealand
0 kt per person
in 2024
Nicaragua
0 kt per person
in 2023
New Zealand rank
40th
Nicaragua rank
40th
Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- New Zealand
- Nicaragua
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 40th and Nicaragua ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita, New Zealand or Nicaragua?
- New Zealand, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita between New Zealand and Nicaragua?
- 0 kt per person, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Nicaragua?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Nicaragua rank globally for open shrubland — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- New Zealand ranks 40th and Nicaragua ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open shrubland — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.