Costa Rica vs Togo: Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Costa Rica
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Togo
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Costa Rica rank
44th
Togo rank
44th
Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Costa Rica
- Togo
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Togo, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 44th and Togo ranks 44th of 124 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -26.53 % change on previous year | -16.67 % change on previous year | 9.86 % change on previous year | Togo |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -58.1 % change on previous year | 41.9 % change on previous year | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Costa Rica or Togo?
- Costa Rica, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Togo as of 2000.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Costa Rica and Togo?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Togo?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2000.
- How do Costa Rica and Togo rank globally for open shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Costa Rica ranks 44th and Togo ranks 44th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.