Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O)

Australia and New Zealand
35.19 kt
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
0.3291 kt
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
3rd

Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
050100150199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 35.19 kt against 0.3291 kt in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 34.86 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 106.9 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 218 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 58.14 kt 5.57 kt 52.57 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 64.51 kt 1.94 kt 62.56 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 61 kt 0.4186 kt 60.58 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 43.73 kt 0.2592 kt 43.47 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher open shrubland — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 35.19 kt against 0.3291 kt in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
34.86 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for open shrubland — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Open shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Open shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 9,224 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.