China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Open shrubland — Emissions
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
44th
Latvia rank
44th
Open shrubland — Emissions over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Latvia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Latvia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia rank globally for open shrubland — emissions?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.