Congo vs Tunisia: Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Congo
0 kt
in 2024
Tunisia
0 kt
in 2024
Congo rank
44th
Tunisia rank
44th
Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Congo
- Tunisia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0195 kt | 0.0023 kt | 0.0172 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0016 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0014 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0046 kt | 0.0045 kt | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0127 kt | 0.0127 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher open shrubland — emissions, Congo or Tunisia?
- Congo, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions between Congo and Tunisia?
- 0 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Tunisia rank globally for open shrubland — emissions?
- Congo ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.