Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Open shrubland — Emissions

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2.9 kt
in 2024
South Africa
0.4781 kt
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th
South Africa rank
6th

Open shrubland — Emissions over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
0510152025199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 2.9 kt against 0.4781 kt in South Africa, a difference of 2.42 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 6.1 times South Africa's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 6th of 31 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 7.07 kt 1 kt 6.06 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 5.62 kt 0.6641 kt 4.96 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 6.66 kt 0.6852 kt 5.97 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 10.5 kt 1.84 kt 8.66 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher open shrubland — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 2.9 kt against 0.4781 kt in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in open shrubland — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
2.42 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for open shrubland — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 6th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Open shrubland — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/open-shrubland-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Open shrubland — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Open shrubland — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 9,224 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.