Oceania vs Sudan: Other — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Other — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) over time
- Oceania
- Sudan
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 2,716 kt against 1,630 kt in Sudan, a difference of 1,086 kt.
That makes Oceania's figure about 1.7 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 28th and Sudan ranks 27th of 33 groups.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,889 kt | 1,923 kt | 966.22 kt | Oceania |
| 2020s | 2,521 kt | 1,729 kt | 792.36 kt | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Oceania or Sudan?
- Oceania, at 2,716 kt against 1,630 kt in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Oceania and Sudan?
- 1,086 kt, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Sudan rank globally for other — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Oceania ranks 28th and Sudan ranks 27th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf