Azerbaijan vs Malawi: Other — Emissions
Other — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.478 kt against 0.463 kt in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.015 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 109th and Malawi ranks 106th of 198 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.525 kt | 0.4308 kt | 0.0943 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 0.3774 kt | 0.4515 kt | 0.0741 kt | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.3893 kt | 0.5074 kt | 0.1181 kt | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.4298 kt | 0.4978 kt | 0.068 kt | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other — emissions, Azerbaijan or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.478 kt against 0.463 kt in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other — emissions between Azerbaijan and Malawi?
- 0.015 kt, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Malawi rank globally for other — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 109th and Malawi ranks 106th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf