Belarus vs Congo: Other — Emissions
Other — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.776 kt against 0.721 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0.055 kt.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 99th and Congo ranks 97th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.12 kt | 1.03 kt | 0.086 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.8446 kt | 0.8284 kt | 0.0162 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.834 kt | 0.8764 kt | 0.0424 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.7438 kt | 0.8425 kt | 0.0988 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other — emissions, Belarus or Congo?
- Congo, at 0.776 kt against 0.721 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other — emissions between Belarus and Congo?
- 0.055 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Congo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Congo rank globally for other — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 99th and Congo ranks 97th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf