Belarus vs Mongolia: Other — Emissions (N2O)
Other — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Belarus
- Mongolia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.721 kt against 0.715 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0.006 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 108th and Mongolia ranks 109th of 228 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.12 kt | 0.3919 kt | 0.727 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.8446 kt | 0.4134 kt | 0.4312 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.834 kt | 0.4923 kt | 0.3417 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.7438 kt | 0.535 kt | 0.2087 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other — emissions, Belarus or Mongolia?
- Belarus, at 0.721 kt against 0.715 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other — emissions between Belarus and Mongolia?
- 0.006 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mongolia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Mongolia rank globally for other — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 108th and Mongolia ranks 109th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf