Belarus vs Somalia: Other — Emissions (N2O)
Other — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Belarus
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 0.744 kt against 0.721 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0.023 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 108th and Somalia ranks 107th of 228 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.12 kt | 0.4081 kt | 0.7107 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.8446 kt | 0.581 kt | 0.2636 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.834 kt | 0.6913 kt | 0.1427 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.7438 kt | 0.7375 kt | 0.0062 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other — emissions, Belarus or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 0.744 kt against 0.721 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other — emissions between Belarus and Somalia?
- 0.023 kt, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Somalia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Somalia rank globally for other — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 108th and Somalia ranks 107th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf