Belize vs Luxembourg: Other — Emissions (N2O)
Other — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Belize
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Belize currently reports 0.0529 kt against 0.0512 kt in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.0017 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Belize ranks 192nd and Luxembourg ranks 193rd of 228 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0364 kt | 0.2059 kt | 0.1695 kt | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.0469 kt | 0.1309 kt | 0.084 kt | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.0424 kt | 0.0641 kt | 0.0217 kt | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other — emissions, Belize or Luxembourg?
- Belize, at 0.0529 kt against 0.0512 kt in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other — emissions between Belize and Luxembourg?
- 0.0017 kt, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Luxembourg rank globally for other — emissions?
- Belize ranks 192nd and Luxembourg ranks 193rd of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf