Egypt vs Sweden: Other forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Egypt
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Egypt rank
90th
Sweden rank
90th
Other forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Egypt
- Sweden
How they compare
Egypt currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sweden ahead.
Egypt ranks 90th and Sweden ranks 90th of 163 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.48 % change on previous year | 57.6 % change on previous year | 15.13 % change on previous year | Sweden |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -51.9 % change on previous year | 48.1 % change on previous year | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, annual growth rate, Egypt or Sweden?
- Egypt, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2000.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area, annual growth rate between Egypt and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sweden?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2000.
- How do Egypt and Sweden rank globally for other forest — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Egypt ranks 90th and Sweden ranks 90th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Other forest — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.