Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-7.44 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
122.23 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
15th
Zimbabwe rank
18th

Other forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Zimbabwe
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 122.23 % change on previous year against -7.44 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 129.67 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 16.4 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 6.38 % change on previous year 3.11 % change on previous year 3.27 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s -2.27 % change on previous year 4.61 % change on previous year 6.88 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 0.5622 % change on previous year 9.59 % change on previous year 9.02 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s -7.03 % change on previous year 49.14 % change on previous year 56.18 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burned area, annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 122.23 % change on previous year against -7.44 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — burned area, annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zimbabwe?
129.67 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for other forest — burned area, annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/zimbabwe/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 4,876 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Other forest — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.