Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Other forest — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
122,337 ha
in 2024
Central America
400,609 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
14th
Central America rank
14th

Other forest — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Central America
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020072024

How they compare

Central America currently reports 400,609 ha against 122,337 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 278,272 ha.

That makes Central America's figure about 3.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and Central America ranks 14th of 219 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Central America Difference Ahead
1990s 586,149 ha 206,474 ha 379,675 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 471,617 ha 184,977 ha 286,640 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 550,642 ha 193,599 ha 357,042 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 435,034 ha 270,099 ha 164,935 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Central America?
Central America, at 400,609 ha against 122,337 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
278,272 ha, with Central America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Central America rank globally for other forest — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and Central America ranks 14th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/">Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Other forest — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,294 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.