Australia and New Zealand vs United States of America: Other forest — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
122,337 ha
in 2024
United States of America
314,263 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
14th
United States of America rank
16th

Other forest — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • United States of America
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020072024

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 314,263 ha against 122,337 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 191,926 ha.

That makes United States of America's figure about 2.6 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and United States of America ranks 16th of 219 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and United States of America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 586,149 ha 307,764 ha 278,385 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 471,617 ha 269,939 ha 201,678 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 550,642 ha 303,207 ha 247,435 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 435,034 ha 487,288 ha 52,254 ha United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or United States of America?
United States of America, at 314,263 ha against 122,337 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and United States of America?
191,926 ha, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and United States of America?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and United States of America rank globally for other forest — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and United States of America ranks 16th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs United States of America: Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/united-states-of-america/">Australia and New Zealand vs United States of America: Other forest — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,294 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.