Botswana vs Tunisia: Other forest — Burned Area
Botswana
235.4 ha
in 2024
Tunisia
171.79 ha
in 2024
Botswana rank
68th
Tunisia rank
71st
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Botswana
- Tunisia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 235.4 ha against 171.79 ha in Tunisia, a difference of 63.61 ha.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.4 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 68th and Tunisia ranks 71st of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,956 ha | 259.82 ha | 9,696 ha | Botswana |
| 2000s | 561.31 ha | 73.61 ha | 487.7 ha | Botswana |
| 2010s | 59.92 ha | 685.02 ha | 625.1 ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 85.6 ha | 837.47 ha | 751.87 ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Botswana or Tunisia?
- Botswana, at 235.4 ha against 171.79 ha in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Botswana and Tunisia?
- 63.61 ha, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Tunisia rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Botswana ranks 68th and Tunisia ranks 71st of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.