Canada vs OECD: Other forest — Burned Area
Canada
717,855 ha
in 2024
OECD
1.59 million ha
in 2024
Canada rank
4th
OECD rank
2nd
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Canada
- OECD
How they compare
OECD currently reports 1.59 million ha against 717,855 ha in Canada, a difference of 868,575 ha.
That makes OECD's figure about 2.2 times Canada's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 4th and OECD ranks 2nd of 214 countries.
OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | OECD | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 526,063 ha | 1.69 million ha | 1.17 million ha | OECD |
| 2000s | 122,451 ha | 1.10 million ha | 979,945 ha | OECD |
| 2010s | 296,787 ha | 1.42 million ha | 1.12 million ha | OECD |
| 2020s | 851,231 ha | 2.17 million ha | 1.32 million ha | OECD |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Canada or OECD?
- OECD, at 1.59 million ha against 717,855 ha in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Canada and OECD?
- 868,575 ha, with OECD ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and OECD?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Canada and OECD rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Canada ranks 4th and OECD ranks 2nd of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.