Chile vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burned Area
Chile
11,277 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
17,119 ha
in 2024
Chile rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
25th
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Chile
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 17,119 ha against 11,277 ha in Chile, a difference of 5,842 ha.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,622 ha | 26,733 ha | 5,890 ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 21,112 ha | 21,854 ha | 741.93 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 49,573 ha | 39,882 ha | 9,690 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 79,243 ha | 10,160 ha | 69,083 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Chile or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 17,119 ha against 11,277 ha in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 5,842 ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Chile ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.