Congo vs Hungary: Other forest — Burned Area
Congo
106.86 ha
in 2024
Hungary
172.2 ha
in 2024
Congo rank
73rd
Hungary rank
70th
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Congo
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 172.2 ha against 106.86 ha in Congo, a difference of 65.34 ha.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.6 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.
Congo ranks 73rd and Hungary ranks 70th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 133.68 ha | 182.16 ha | 48.47 ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 161.45 ha | 474.22 ha | 312.77 ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 123.95 ha | 167.93 ha | 43.98 ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 162.42 ha | 60.27 ha | 102.15 ha | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Congo or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 172.2 ha against 106.86 ha in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Congo and Hungary?
- 65.34 ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Hungary?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Hungary rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Congo ranks 73rd and Hungary ranks 70th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.