Ecuador vs Eswatini: Other forest — Burned Area
Ecuador
6,839 ha
in 2024
Eswatini
3,578 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
33rd
Eswatini rank
36th
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Eswatini
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 6,839 ha against 3,578 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 3,261 ha.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.9 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Ecuador ranks 33rd and Eswatini ranks 36th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,238 ha | 6,314 ha | 5,076 ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 1,083 ha | 6,497 ha | 5,414 ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,539 ha | 4,107 ha | 2,569 ha | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 2,633 ha | 1,976 ha | 657.41 ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Ecuador or Eswatini?
- Ecuador, at 6,839 ha against 3,578 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 3,261 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd and Eswatini ranks 36th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.