Ecuador vs Malawi: Other forest — Burned Area
Ecuador
6,839 ha
in 2024
Malawi
7,634 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
33rd
Malawi rank
32nd
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 7,634 ha against 6,839 ha in Ecuador, a difference of 795 ha.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 33rd and Malawi ranks 32nd of 219 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,238 ha | 12,530 ha | 11,292 ha | Malawi |
| 2000s | 1,083 ha | 24,646 ha | 23,563 ha | Malawi |
| 2010s | 1,539 ha | 20,135 ha | 18,596 ha | Malawi |
| 2020s | 2,633 ha | 10,611 ha | 7,978 ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Ecuador or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 7,634 ha against 6,839 ha in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Ecuador and Malawi?
- 795 ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd and Malawi ranks 32nd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.