El Salvador vs Namibia: Other forest — Burned Area
El Salvador
21.38 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
El Salvador rank
92nd
Namibia rank
93rd
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- El Salvador
- Namibia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 21.38 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 21.38 ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 92nd and Namibia ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 414.31 ha | 1,459 ha | 1,045 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 190.09 ha | 887.55 ha | 697.46 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1,287 ha | 57.77 ha | 1,230 ha | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 260.9 ha | 158.33 ha | 102.57 ha | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, El Salvador or Namibia?
- El Salvador, at 21.38 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between El Salvador and Namibia?
- 21.38 ha, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Namibia rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- El Salvador ranks 92nd and Namibia ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.