Eswatini vs South Sudan: Other forest — Burned Area
Eswatini
3,578 ha
in 2024
South Sudan
5,408 ha
in 2024
Eswatini rank
36th
South Sudan rank
34th
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Eswatini
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 5,408 ha against 3,578 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 1,830 ha.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 36th and South Sudan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,624 ha | 4,328 ha | 704.49 ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 1,976 ha | 5,387 ha | 3,411 ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Eswatini or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 5,408 ha against 3,578 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Eswatini and South Sudan?
- 1,830 ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and South Sudan rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Eswatini ranks 36th and South Sudan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.