Grenada vs Micronesia: Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Micronesia
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada rank
103rd
Micronesia rank
103rd
Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Grenada
- Micronesia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Micronesia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Micronesia has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 103rd and Micronesia ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area — fao tier 1, Grenada or Micronesia?
- Grenada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Micronesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area — fao tier 1 between Grenada and Micronesia?
- 0 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Micronesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Micronesia rank globally for other forest — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Grenada ranks 103rd and Micronesia ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.