Kazakhstan vs Rwanda: Other forest — Burned Area
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
93rd
Rwanda rank
93rd
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 93rd and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,653 ha | 755.81 ha | 10,897 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 2,014 ha | 191.05 ha | 1,823 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 163.72 ha | 190.2 ha | 26.48 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 887.1 ha | 111.13 ha | 775.98 ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Kazakhstan or Rwanda?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
- 0 ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Rwanda rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 93rd and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.