Lesotho vs Namibia: Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Lesotho
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Lesotho rank
103rd
Namibia rank
103rd
Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Lesotho
- Namibia
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,578 ha | 1,459 ha | 118.21 ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 15.15 ha | 887.55 ha | 872.41 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 57.77 ha | 57.77 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 4.29 ha | 158.33 ha | 154.04 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area — fao tier 1, Lesotho or Namibia?
- Lesotho, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area — fao tier 1 between Lesotho and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Lesotho and Namibia rank globally for other forest — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Lesotho ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.