Maldives vs Namibia: Other forest — Burned Area
Maldives
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Maldives rank
93rd
Namibia rank
93rd
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Maldives
- Namibia
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 93rd of 214 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 1,459 ha | 1,459 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 887.55 ha | 887.55 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 57.77 ha | 57.77 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 158.33 ha | 158.33 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Maldives or Namibia?
- Maldives, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Maldives and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Maldives and Namibia rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Maldives ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 93rd of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.