Mali vs Namibia: Other forest — Burned Area
Mali
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Mali rank
93rd
Namibia rank
93rd
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Mali
- Namibia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 152,888 ha | 1,459 ha | 151,429 ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 10,012 ha | 887.55 ha | 9,124 ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 57.77 ha | 57.77 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 158.33 ha | 158.33 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Mali or Namibia?
- Mali, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Mali and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Mali ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.