Namibia vs Polynesia: Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia rank
103rd
Polynesia rank
103rd
Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Namibia
- Polynesia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 103rd and Polynesia ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,459 ha | 0 ha | 1,459 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 887.55 ha | 0 ha | 887.55 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 57.77 ha | 0 ha | 57.77 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 158.33 ha | 0 ha | 158.33 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area — fao tier 1, Namibia or Polynesia?
- Namibia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area — fao tier 1 between Namibia and Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Polynesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Polynesia rank globally for other forest — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Namibia ranks 103rd and Polynesia ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.