Namibia vs Uzbekistan: Other forest — Burned Area
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia rank
93rd
Uzbekistan rank
93rd
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Namibia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Namibia ranks 93rd and Uzbekistan ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,647 ha | 3,701 ha | 2,054 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 887.55 ha | 609.83 ha | 277.72 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 57.77 ha | 0 ha | 57.77 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 158.33 ha | 0 ha | 158.33 ha | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Namibia or Uzbekistan?
- Namibia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Namibia and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Uzbekistan rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Namibia ranks 93rd and Uzbekistan ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.