Nepal vs Oceania: Other forest — Burned Area
Nepal
39,978 ha
in 2024
Oceania
123,491 ha
in 2024
Nepal rank
21st
Oceania rank
18th
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Nepal
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 123,491 ha against 39,978 ha in Nepal, a difference of 83,513 ha.
That makes Oceania's figure about 3.1 times Nepal's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 21st and Oceania ranks 18th of 219 countries.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,702 ha | 600,203 ha | 593,501 ha | Oceania |
| 2000s | 4,294 ha | 474,365 ha | 470,071 ha | Oceania |
| 2010s | 9,005 ha | 555,284 ha | 546,279 ha | Oceania |
| 2020s | 16,261 ha | 437,372 ha | 421,111 ha | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Nepal or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 123,491 ha against 39,978 ha in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Nepal and Oceania?
- 83,513 ha, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Oceania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Oceania rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Nepal ranks 21st and Oceania ranks 18th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.