Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs OECD: Other forest — Burned Area

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
3.26 million ha
in 2024
OECD
1.59 million ha
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
3rd
OECD rank
2nd

Other forest — Burned Area over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • OECD
02.0M4.0M6.0M199020072024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 3.26 million ha against 1.59 million ha in OECD, a difference of 1.67 million ha.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 2.1 times OECD's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 2nd of 31 groups.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) OECD Difference Ahead
1990s 3.83 million ha 1.69 million ha 2.13 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 4.69 million ha 1.10 million ha 3.58 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 5.34 million ha 1.42 million ha 3.93 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 3.81 million ha 2.17 million ha 1.63 million ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other forest — burned area, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or OECD?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 3.26 million ha against 1.59 million ha in OECD as of 2024.
What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and OECD?
1.67 million ha, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and OECD?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and OECD rank globally for other forest — burned area?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 2nd of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs OECD: Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/other-forest-burned-area-fao-tier-1/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/oecd/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs OECD: Other forest — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other forest — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,294 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.