New Zealand vs Uganda: Other forest — Burned Area
New Zealand
644.4 ha
in 2024
Uganda
662.48 ha
in 2024
New Zealand rank
58th
Uganda rank
56th
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- New Zealand
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 662.48 ha against 644.4 ha in New Zealand, a difference of 18.08 ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.
New Zealand ranks 58th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 195.07 ha | 3,935 ha | 3,740 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 246.88 ha | 1,620 ha | 1,373 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 266.55 ha | 752.23 ha | 485.69 ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 425.39 ha | 829.17 ha | 403.78 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, New Zealand or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 662.48 ha against 644.4 ha in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between New Zealand and Uganda?
- 18.08 ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Uganda rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- New Zealand ranks 58th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.