Philippines vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burned Area
Philippines
12,023 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
17,119 ha
in 2024
Philippines rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
25th
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Philippines
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 17,119 ha against 12,023 ha in Philippines, a difference of 5,096 ha.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Philippines's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 219 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,262 ha | 26,733 ha | 23,471 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 2,405 ha | 21,854 ha | 19,449 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 4,967 ha | 39,882 ha | 34,915 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 4,903 ha | 10,160 ha | 5,256 ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Philippines or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 17,119 ha against 12,023 ha in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Philippines and Zimbabwe?
- 5,096 ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Philippines and Zimbabwe rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Philippines ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.