Polynesia vs Rwanda: Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia rank
103rd
Rwanda rank
103rd
Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Polynesia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 103rd and Rwanda ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 667.76 ha | 667.76 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 191.05 ha | 191.05 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 190.2 ha | 190.2 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 111.13 ha | 111.13 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area — fao tier 1, Polynesia or Rwanda?
- Polynesia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area — fao tier 1 between Polynesia and Rwanda?
- 0 ha, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Polynesia and Rwanda rank globally for other forest — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Polynesia ranks 103rd and Rwanda ranks 103rd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.