Rwanda vs Sweden: Other forest — Burned Area
Rwanda
0 ha
in 2024
Sweden
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda rank
93rd
Sweden rank
93rd
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Rwanda
- Sweden
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Rwanda ranks 93rd and Sweden ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 667.76 ha | 447.97 ha | 219.79 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 191.05 ha | 64.09 ha | 126.96 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 190.2 ha | 1,112 ha | 921.55 ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 111.13 ha | 0 ha | 111.13 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Rwanda or Sweden?
- Rwanda, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Rwanda and Sweden?
- 0 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Rwanda ranks 93rd and Sweden ranks 93rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.