Ukraine vs Zimbabwe: Other forest — Burned Area
Ukraine
29,708 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
17,119 ha
in 2024
Ukraine rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
25th
Other forest — Burned Area over time
- Ukraine
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 29,708 ha against 17,119 ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 12,589 ha.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.7 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Ukraine ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ukraine averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,290 ha | 26,734 ha | 17,444 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 8,623 ha | 21,854 ha | 13,231 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 21,354 ha | 39,882 ha | 18,528 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 20,184 ha | 10,160 ha | 10,025 ha | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — burned area, Ukraine or Zimbabwe?
- Ukraine, at 29,708 ha against 17,119 ha in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — burned area between Ukraine and Zimbabwe?
- 12,589 ha, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Zimbabwe?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Ukraine and Zimbabwe rank globally for other forest — burned area?
- Ukraine ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other forest — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.